<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Counting OpenOffice.org Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/528/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/528</link>
	<description>Home of The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Horst</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/528#comment-19430</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Horst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 14:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/528#comment-19430</guid>
		<description>Chris,
Unfortunately, I do not know the answer to your question right now. You are right that Linux distros make changes to the OOo code, and these changes can be very significant. (For example, it might not make sense for a customized version of OOo to have its own update feature when the Linux distro that OOo is running in has its own built-in update feature already.) 

Currently, while the Linux userbase is still relatively small, this will only affect statistics slightly. In the future, as Linux marketshare grows, we'll have to search for a new solution to the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
Unfortunately, I do not know the answer to your question right now. You are right that Linux distros make changes to the OOo code, and these changes can be very significant. (For example, it might not make sense for a customized version of OOo to have its own update feature when the Linux distro that OOo is running in has its own built-in update feature already.) </p>
<p>Currently, while the Linux userbase is still relatively small, this will only affect statistics slightly. In the future, as Linux marketshare grows, we&#8217;ll have to search for a new solution to the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Puttick</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/528#comment-19417</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Puttick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 08:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/528#comment-19417</guid>
		<description>The update feature - will this be enabled in Linux distros versions? In particular I believe (!) Novell make significant changes to the OpenOffice code and presumably disable the update feature; Ubuntu (at least) add libwps - if an update from OOo would overwrite that, presumably they also would disable the update feature. So do we still have the count challenge after all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The update feature - will this be enabled in Linux distros versions? In particular I believe (!) Novell make significant changes to the OpenOffice code and presumably disable the update feature; Ubuntu (at least) add libwps - if an update from OOo would overwrite that, presumably they also would disable the update feature. So do we still have the count challenge after all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
