<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ODF-Capable Apps: Thoughtslinger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545</link>
	<description>Home of The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: concurrent collaborative document editing &#171; fuzzybrain&#124;daisychain&#124;blogdrain</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545#comment-21507</link>
		<dc:creator>concurrent collaborative document editing &#171; fuzzybrain&#124;daisychain&#124;blogdrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 07:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545#comment-21507</guid>
		<description>[...] * comments at the SolidOffice blog note the absence of styles and acknowledge the fact that the technology is beta. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * comments at the SolidOffice blog note the absence of styles and acknowledge the fact that the technology is beta. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Horst</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545#comment-20556</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Horst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 11:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545#comment-20556</guid>
		<description>Peter, thanks for your comments and the link to your review. Thoughtslinger indicated to me they're in an early beta, so technical issues are to be expected at this point. Your feedback will be valuable to them, so I'm sure they will be happy to hear it and incorporate it as they move forward.

I haven't read the license closely yet, so I'll take a look at that, too. Not sure that telling people what to think could be an enforceable license clause!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, thanks for your comments and the link to your review. Thoughtslinger indicated to me they&#8217;re in an early beta, so technical issues are to be expected at this point. Your feedback will be valuable to them, so I&#8217;m sure they will be happy to hear it and incorporate it as they move forward.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read the license closely yet, so I&#8217;ll take a look at that, too. Not sure that telling people what to think could be an enforceable license clause!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sefton</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545#comment-20553</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sefton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 10:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545#comment-20553</guid>
		<description>Left off the URL from the last comment: http://ptsefton.com/blog/2007/05/22/thoughtslinger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Left off the URL from the last comment: <a href="http://ptsefton.com/blog/2007/05/22/thoughtslinger" rel="nofollow">http://ptsefton.com/blog/2007/05/22/thoughtslinger</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Sefton</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545#comment-20552</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sefton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 10:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/545#comment-20552</guid>
		<description>I have had a look at Thoughtslinger and posted my impressions on my blog. The short version is No Styles! and no Undo button. And once I read the license properly I didn't think I could keep it, it appears to say you're not even allowed to think about how the application works! See </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a look at Thoughtslinger and posted my impressions on my blog. The short version is No Styles! and no Undo button. And once I read the license properly I didn&#8217;t think I could keep it, it appears to say you&#8217;re not even allowed to think about how the application works! See</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
