<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Shuttleworth: ODF Beats MSOOXML</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/571/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/571</link>
	<description>Home of The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Don Watkins</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/571#comment-28355</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 16:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/571#comment-28355</guid>
		<description>It strikes me that Microsoft is flailing about attempt to convince itself that it has a future. The rest of the world is going for ODF and Microsoft will eventually be forced to as well. There struggle is indicative of the desperation already present in Redmond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It strikes me that Microsoft is flailing about attempt to convince itself that it has a future. The rest of the world is going for ODF and Microsoft will eventually be forced to as well. There struggle is indicative of the desperation already present in Redmond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
