<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux will Dominate the Desktop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/675/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/675</link>
	<description>Home of The Tiny Guide to OpenOffice.org</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: OOoH &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letture Inglesi (25/11/2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/675#comment-42623</link>
		<dc:creator>OOoH &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Letture Inglesi (25/11/2007)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/675#comment-42623</guid>
		<description>[...] Linux will Dominate the Desktop [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Linux will Dominate the Desktop [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin Horst</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/675#comment-41721</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Horst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/675#comment-41721</guid>
		<description>Andy, that is an important point. Fighting over the desktop is fighting to control the previous battleground! 

Maybe Microsoft chooses to fight there because it's where their entire business model lives--and they have shown little to no success in adapting to the web, so they don't have much choice but to hang on to what they've got now. Meanwhile, FOSS has the luxury of taking over the web client marketplace and fighting very competitively for fat client desktops at the same time, simply because the community is now so big and broad-based.

Look how well Linux has done in other new categories--consumer electronics, mobile devices, web servers, etc. Thin clients will certainly flock to Linux, too. We're blocking MS from taking over new markets now, and ready to assault their home territory to push them out of that, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, that is an important point. Fighting over the desktop is fighting to control the previous battleground! </p>
<p>Maybe Microsoft chooses to fight there because it&#8217;s where their entire business model lives&#8211;and they have shown little to no success in adapting to the web, so they don&#8217;t have much choice but to hang on to what they&#8217;ve got now. Meanwhile, FOSS has the luxury of taking over the web client marketplace and fighting very competitively for fat client desktops at the same time, simply because the community is now so big and broad-based.</p>
<p>Look how well Linux has done in other new categories&#8211;consumer electronics, mobile devices, web servers, etc. Thin clients will certainly flock to Linux, too. We&#8217;re blocking MS from taking over new markets now, and ready to assault their home territory to push them out of that, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andylockran</title>
		<link>http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/675#comment-41719</link>
		<dc:creator>andylockran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solidoffice.com/archives/675#comment-41719</guid>
		<description>I would argue that it is a bit of a nonsense situation.  On the one hand, the adoption of GNU/Linux as a desktop operating system is the aim, giving the end users "freedom" from vendor lock-in..and all that jazz.  However, the Desktop is becoming more and more a "thin-client" for web usage.  The low cost of memory, ever increasing bandwidth, and most of all universal availability, means that the average end-users desktop is becoming a _less_ important place.

However, that's just one side of the argument, as there are lots of end-users that will continue to utilize and actually _take responsibility_ for their own documents and media.  It is therefore the size of this second group that will define the success of GNU.. but maybe not the success of Linux.

It's a really interesting topic (and far to complex to discuss in a comment box) -  but the end of a single-vendor dominance is eagerly anticipated and should be celebrated.  I'm just pleased it's because that GNU/Linux is usurping it naturally - rather than through artificial and unsustainable means,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that it is a bit of a nonsense situation.  On the one hand, the adoption of GNU/Linux as a desktop operating system is the aim, giving the end users &#8220;freedom&#8221; from vendor lock-in..and all that jazz.  However, the Desktop is becoming more and more a &#8220;thin-client&#8221; for web usage.  The low cost of memory, ever increasing bandwidth, and most of all universal availability, means that the average end-users desktop is becoming a _less_ important place.</p>
<p>However, that&#8217;s just one side of the argument, as there are lots of end-users that will continue to utilize and actually _take responsibility_ for their own documents and media.  It is therefore the size of this second group that will define the success of GNU.. but maybe not the success of Linux.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a really interesting topic (and far to complex to discuss in a comment box) -  but the end of a single-vendor dominance is eagerly anticipated and should be celebrated.  I&#8217;m just pleased it&#8217;s because that GNU/Linux is usurping it naturally - rather than through artificial and unsustainable means,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
